My philosophy of history is this. The majority of history is made by the leaders that we do not know. Most of history is not made by the president. It is made by those working around him. Historiarchy is not about the rulers making history, it is about the influence that every person has on history and that history has on every person. It is about how every person out there makes history in his or her own way.
History is a story and we all rule over that story. We do things that others will remember and often do those things in a manner in which their histories will look favorably toward us. We also rule over history in a second, much more important manner. We choose what history to write and how to write it. We decide what history is and what it is not. History is not a stagnant thing. It is not simply dusty books and old professors. History is an ever-changing story full of knowledge.Some say that we cannot revise history, but I take offense to that. I scream that history is not a stagnant, perfect book that displays all of the secrets of our world's past and present situations before us. It is simply the vessel that passes along the knowledge of people prior to us.
Historiarchy is the view that history rules over us and that we, each and every one of us, rule over history.
Because of this, I find it inexplicably important that history must be conveyed in a manner that does not try to compare the problems of the past to the problems of today. We can look back and see the roots of today's controversies, the ways that history still stands proud and rules over us, but we must not make the problems of the past the problems of today. Whether that be discrimination or racism or violence, we cannot let the struggles of the past become the struggles of today.
No comments:
Post a Comment